TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES

I’ve been highly anticipating the 2014 release of the reboot for “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” which is now showing in theatres. It’s produced by Michael Bay and Co and Directing is South African filmmaker Jonathan Liebesman (director of “Wrath Of The Titans” and “Battle Los Angeles” two films that I really enjoyed). This updated and modern take on the turtles was always going to be a risky undertaking because of the nostalgia people experience watching the original films. Michael Bay has been getting a lot of hate recently and that’s mainly to do with the most recent Transformers film (which I myself haven’t seen), but it’s apparently 158 minutes of pure torture (haha). I don’t have any issue with Michael Bay and I have enjoyed most of The Transformers films. With one of his productions you know what you’re in for before it even starts, keep an open mind with this one guys, he didn’t direct it he only produced so settle…

Most of you have already been introduced to this world and you know the story here. The Turtles have been raised from birth in a lab and upon its destruction Splinter (the rat), is left to raise Raphael, Donatello, Leonardo and Michelangelo beneath the sewers of New York City. The evil kingpin Shredder aims to take over the city, The Turtles along with very determined and driven news reporter April O’Neil, must band together to stop him and save the city. The cast includes Megan Fox, Will Arnett, William Fichtner and Whoopi Goldberg. The voice actors are Alan Ritchson, Noel Fisher, Johnny Knoxville and Jeremy Howard.

THE GOOD

I’m going to attempt to talk about the film without making comparisons to the original trilogy of films from the 90’s (that might be difficult to do haha). Firstly, this installment was made in 3D, well released in 3D anyways. Most of the time the films that are being shown in 3D these days are hoping to enhance the viewing experience and for the most part they do. I can’t help but feel that TMNT didn’t need it. Michael Bay always feels the need to be bigger and better and I think sometimes it’s just easier not to try to outdo yourself. The one thing I really enjoyed about this version was the effort involved in depicting a great back story, which I think is the films strongest aspect. We got a bit of insight into the turtles and what’s taken place in the past and how it’s led to the plight they now find themselves in. I never read the comics so I don’t know how well that aspect was covered but I don’t remember them ever divulging all that much information in the 90’s films.

The acting for the most part was solid though I’m not sure Megan Fox can pull of a lead role. Emotionally I don’t think she can really hit the mark that’s necessary, maybe it’s not needed in a film like this but I don’t think she is going to ever make the change to more serious drama films. The CG was very impressive but with a budget of over 100 million dollars, most of which gets spent on CG and paying the actors, I would expect it to look this good. The best parts are the chase/action sequences between the turtles and Shredder’s men particularly in the final act. The main reason most of us adults watch these types of films so we can step out of reality for 90 minutes of fun and for the most part this reboot does that.

THE BAD

The biggest letdown of the film is unfortunately in some of the casting. For example, I like Will Arnett I think his work in Arrested Development was hilarious. He will forever be Stranz Van Waldenberg too me (Blades Of Glory reference people haha), not cameraman Vernon Fenwick in TMNT, it just doesn’t work. It’s not his fault but the lines the writers gave him were just in the hopes of getting some cheap forced laughs and it just came across like he was trying too hard. Without those jokes he literally had no purpose being in the film. If that wasn’t bad enough you just know William Fichtner as Eric Sacks, owner of a big wealthy corporation is going to turn out to be bad before the film even gets underway (duh! we all know that). The fact that his motive is money when he’s already at least a millionaire seems painfully unoriginal. William is a wonderful actor but he is always the bad guy so cast someone else and don’t make it so damn obvious. If you don’t want the film being labelled predictable and comparisons to the rest of your body of work try something new.

On another disappointing note, the lack of banter and one liners from our Turtles and Splinter changes everything I remember and love about Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Other than one Pizza reference and a couple of inside jokes between turtles, the humour was non-existent. Shredder’s men look like a knock off of Special Forces and not old school ninjas. One of the best things about the 90’s films was those ninjas, think of the battle with Keno and the ninjas in the shopping complex which I think is in the second film.  I was hoping for those types of nods towards the original films but got nothing. The way in which this was shot was also pretty rapidly cut together. The second half of the film was better but the action sequence in the truck on the mountain went on and on. Combine the length of the scene with the way they displayed the CG snow and the handheld shaky camera work as the turtles slide out from under the truck etc etc, and it let’s the entire scene down.

This reboot of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles probably didn’t need to be made. I’m not saying it’s not an entertaining enough 104 minutes to kill, but it’s just a very by the book and predictable end product. It misses the mark on a basic level of humour and nostalgia towards the chessyness that was the 90’s films. The digital effects were a standout but I think in modern-day filmmaking voice actors in turtle suits (like in the 90’s) would have worked just as well. Was this a success considering over 100 million dollars was spent on making it?? Probably not. Is it worth a look on a Saturday night though? Sure. COWABUNGA DUDE!

My rating for “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” is 5.5/10

AXE GIANT:THE WRATH OF PAUL BUNYAN

Axe Giant:The Wrath Of Paul Bunyan is the latest effort from director Gary Jones (Boogeyman 3), continuing with the trend of Asylum released low-budget creature/feature films (for lack of a better word). Axe Giant is a film about a group of young adults who have broken the law in various ways and have now been enlisted in a boot-camp, rehabilitation program of sorts. The group consists of CB (Amber Connor) who was involved in a drink driving incident, Zack, the typical bad boy(Jesse Kove) along with Trish (Jill Evyn), Marty (Clifton Williams) and Rosa (Victoria Ramos). Sgt Hoke (played by Thomas Downey), is the Drill Sargent leading their expedition through the woods accompanied by peer counselor Mrs K (Kristina Kopf), who is responsible for the safety of the group. Shortly into their hike Zack decides to steal a fossil from a burial site and the group finds themselves being hunted by a giant axe wielding lumber jack named Paul Bunyan who wants it back.

The film also stars Joe Estevez, Tim Lovelace, Dan Haggerty and Chris Hahn. Like most of the films that either air on the Syfy channel or are released direct to video by The Asylum this one doesn’t really cut it. You end up with a pretty cheap product that relies heavily on the gimmick of bad CGI and the fact that people who like 90 minutes of dumb fun might… just might, watch your film (haha)

THE GOOD

For once I actually think that this is a fun and cool concept for a film, not just another shark film (even though I like them). Like I said it probably falls in the category of the Syfy channel quality of films but none the less a giant axe-wielding legend is pretty cool, Am I right?? Given this is low-budget, I don’t actually know how low but I would probably guess somewhere in between $100 to $500-000 (don’t quote me on that), the look of Paul Bunyan is pretty good. He has some giant warts and long scraggly hair and basically just looks like a giant mountain man… literally. The films obvious technical aspects are pretty solid. The audio is nice and clear and the camera work for the most part is pretty smooth. The problems occur during a couple of the chase scenes where the camera starts getting shaky and during several of the conversations the camera zooms too close to the actors faces which is a problem aesthetically.

The score was decent enough but the southern twang behind most of the sound effects got old really fast. The highlight in Axe Giant is the body count and the quality of the kills, given the budget and time spent on this film it’s all pretty good. Sure, its digital effects and they didn’t even try to incorporate any practical blood unless it was coming from one of the actors mouths but still… There are enough fun kills here to satisfy most of the audience that watch these types of films. A couple of the best ones were the cool decapitation and some body splits.

THE BAD

Now let’s get to the bad because you all know it’s coming. It’s obvious from the opening sequence of the film that this crew were never going to be able to pull off the look of 1894 (and they don’t haha) so why bother?? I know they probably aimed to give the story and legend some groundwork and that’s okay but it’s not really what we’re watching the film for is it?? Combine that with the unnecessary CG backdrops (the bear and other animals come to mind), along with the actors faces being too close to the camera and you get a disappointing overall start. What made it more obvious was the fact that it started with quick pacing and some brutal deaths but quickly died (pardon the pun), because of those issues. There are also plenty of lighting/shadow problems during the day time scenes and a lot of lazy editing including starting a scene with a very similar shot from the scene before and that’s just not well thought out.

The acting wasn’t too bad but the weakest of the bunch was Thomas Downey playing Sgt Hoke. This performance just felt really forced and awkward. I’m not sure how the character was written on paper and whether he was supposed to feel real but this was no R. Lee Ermey that’s for sure and I didn’t find him intimidating or buy the fact that he could make any real changes in these kids minds. The rest of the cast had a few weak moments but were mostly serviceable given their amount of experience. Another thing, why set the film in Minnesota and then ignore the fact that there should be a mid-west accent or two amongst the group, surely?? Just from a few scenes I could tell most of this thing looked like it was shot in California or Ohio and sure enough it was! There isn’t any of that cool “Fargo” lingo which could have made this film so much more fun, darn tooting! (see what I did there..). Don’t even get me started on Joe Estevez as a crazy old mountain man who sounded like he was from the deep south??? I mean what the hell? What on earth brings him to Minnesota? And if he has been there for so long why does he have such a thick southern accent?. Just a lot of small attention to detail made no sense.

I can accept all of those things in a cheesy film such as this one but the digital and practical effects blending was just poor and it’s the films main selling point. I don’t mean special effects because they aren’t special. I’m talking about CGI characters in a real backdrop or a real actor in a CGI background, there is absolutely no need for it. Anything you can shoot practically you should and clearly they opted not too here. I understand the action sequences have to be created and some CGI used but at least make the foreground look conceivably real and have some continuity with the editing. This one has no structure and gives the whole thing such an amateurish film, it hurts the re-watchability aspect.

Axe Giant:The Wrath Of Paul Bunyan wasn’t a horrible way to kill 85 minutes. I think it has some nice shots and a fun story with a bunch of really cool and cheesy kills. However it lacks far too many of the basics that need to be done right in order to separate itself from any one of the other hundreds of films being made like this every year, therefore planting itself firmly in the average at best pile.

My review for “Axe Giant” is 4.5/10

INTO THE STORM

This is a new review for Steven Quale’s (director of Final Destination 5) new blockbuster disaster film “Into The Storm”. I was a big fan of FD5 so it’s nice to Steven back behind the camera again. I like that this film didn’t draw on big Hollywood A-listers or a well established director, the end result makes this all the more impressive. Into The Storm is a film told from several different points of view. Pete (played by Matt Ross from Todd Phillips’s various films) plays a tornado/twister hunter and his life’s work has consisted of trying to get footage from within the eye of a storm in the hopes of learning more about the phenomenon. He travels around in his custom “Titus” which is a vehicle equip to handle the conditions. He has a documentary crew on board which is made up of Daryl (Arlen Escarpeta), Jacob (Jeremy Sumpter) and Lucas (Lee Whittaker). Allison (played by Walking Dead’s Sarah Callies), is the groups research analyst responsible for tracking the storms.

The second point of view in the film comes from 17-year-old high school student Donnie (played by a somewhat newcomer Max Deacon), who is supposed to be recording a video time capsule for his future self in 25 years. Donnie has the biggest crush on a girl at school named Kaitlyn (the lovely Alycia Carey), he sees an opportunity to help her with a school project which leaves Donnie’s younger brother Trey (Nathan Kress) to film the high school graduation, a job given to Donnie by the vice principal who happens to be Donnie’s father Gary (Richard Armitage). Shortly into the graduation a storm hits, leaving Gary and Trey stranded at the school while Donnie is trapped at an abandoned factory. The documentary team and Gary’s and Trey are about to cross paths when they get caught in a series of tornado’s trying to rescue Donnie before the town of Silverton is flattened.

THE GOOD

The various uses and style of the camera work in this film separates it from a lot of other disaster flicks. It would have been really easy to copy something like Cloverfield or model the look of the film on something else we have already seen before. Thus, by the use of several different camera’s following the action from multiple points of view we get a slightly different and original take on things. The audio and booming sound effects were fantastic. You’re going to get the most bang for your buck if you see this one in theatres, the only thing that could have enhanced this even more would have been a 3D transfer. Majority of the cast don’t have a lot of experience but they still managed to do a pretty good job of convincing us that they are as scared as they appear to be. The chemistry was pretty good between Gary and his two sons (which is kind of the drama aspect). The standout for me though was Max Deacon, he has that every nerdy kind of teenage boy look about him but he brings the goods when it matters most. I thought he was definitely the strongest in the more emotionally heavy scenes, he was that good that it dragged everybody else down somewhat.

I heard the film was loosely based on a couple of Twister Hunters in the U.S that were killed about a year ago trying to get up close and personal to one. You really get the feel of how devastating one of these would be if you were caught up in it, but at the same time I’d imagine it to be quiet mesmerizing. Digitally the film is flawless. The CGI blend in all the action sequences is very smooth. I like that it continues to knock you on your ass! Every time the action hits you, you get just enough time to catch your breath before the group is caught back up in another intense tornado and that’s how a disaster film should be. The cool gadgets, including the “Titus” vehicle also make for some truly entertaining climactic scenes.

THE BAD

Like I said the acting for the most part is pretty consistent but a few members of the cast had a weak moment or two. The character of Jacob projected nothing, no fear, no desperation, no anything. I’m sure it was probably written that way but in that case he probably didn’t need to be there other than to make up the numbers. Richard Armitage felt a little Bruce Campbell-ish (B grade), in his emotions during some of the rescue attempts and Nathan Kress didn’t seem all that worried about the dire straits either. Obviously you can’t take the premise of the movie with 100 percent accuracy otherwise majority of the cast would have been decapitated by shrapnel moving at 300mph or whatever… (haha). But it would have been nice to see a bit more effort in the attention to detail with cell phones and camera equipment. They could have at least covered their camera’s with plastic to avoid them getting saturated during the storm, because well.. they wouldn’t work. Kaitlyn seems surprised when her cell doesn’t work after water has been rising up to her neck and the phone has been getting wet for most of the movie (ah hello?? duh!). I like the stuff with Donk and his redneck buddy and it’s probably not that far from the truth to be honest (haha). I think they were mostly there for some comedic relief though. A few times it got a bit too silly and just before the closing credit’s was a pretty big stretch and It’s a highly unlikely outcome for the pair.

As far as pure entertaining disaster movies go their hasn’t been one as good as Into The Storm since Roland Emmerich’s “2012”. It’s not cliché in the character development or the relationship aspect, it’s got great pacing and it’s a lot of fun. We have a talented Non-A list group of actors that have a natural chemistry. There are some really cool toys and most importantly the digital effects and epic tornadoes put something like Twister to shame. Your unlikely to see anything this good again for a while, so if you enjoy films like 2012 and The Day After Tomorrow be sure to catch this one in a theatre soon!!

My review for “Into The Storm” is 7.5/10

THE HELPERS

“The Helpers” or “No Vacancy” as it was also released under, is a horror film from 2012 directed by Christopher Stokes (“You Got Served” and “Somebody Help Me”). It’s a film about Seven friends that are going on a road trip to Vegas for the weekend. Phil (played by JoJo Wright) is documenting the trip on video for his girlfriend Julie. The other 6 are made up of couples Todd and Claire (Dustin Harnish and Kristen Quintrall), Jordan and Brandy (Black Thomas and Denyce Lawton) and Ryan and Anna (Christopher Jones and Rachel Sterling). Shortly into the car ride they have to make a detour which results in them blowing out a set of tires. The boys decide to head off on foot and try to find a gas station/motel and get the car fixed (not sure why you wouldn’t have a spare??), little do they know there are a group of people running the Motel known as “The Helpers” and they are bound to get more than they bargain for when they cross this twisted family. The film also stars Braxton Davis, Cameron Diskin, Dallas Lovato and Rebecca Burchett.

I had read a few reviews online (which I don’t normally do) that basically labelled this film an unoriginal and by the books, farfetched film that has nothing new to say. That may be the case in some people’s minds but that doesn’t mean their isn’t fun to be had here and I did.

THE GOOD

The camera work and some of the angles that were used in the “found footage” parts of the film, along with the audio were really professionally done. A lot of really cool, bass orientated sound effects were used during some of the more suspenseful scenes and they worked well. The score was only average but I liked a lot of the music choices. A musician named Tracy Irve performed most of the songs you hear throughout the film. She has a real mellow easy listening kind of style but im not sure that really works for the genre of film here, but I still enjoyed it regardless. I think the majority of the acting is on point and the cast all have pretty good chemistry. For the male audience there are a bunch of knockout girls including Dallas Lovato and Rebecca Burchett who play the villains. Rachel Sterling is absolutely gorgeous along with our “final girl” Kristen Quintrall who is lovely as well. I enjoyed some of the action sequences even though they took a while to get the ball rolling. They weren’t the most original ideas but they were executed pretty well. A couple of cool torture scenes and a beheading were the standout kills. Obviously a few digital effects were used that were noticeable but didn’t take anything away from the end result.

THE BAD

Obviously no one can ignore the blatant lack of originality and the comparisons to films like “Vacancy” and “Terror Trap”, along with some definite nods to “The Hitcher” as well. I’m one of those people who doesn’t really have a problem with capitalizing on a successful idea that has already been done before. As long as you aren’t attempting to pass it off as your own or label it original when it’s not that’s fine, and I don’t think Chris Stokes was. There are a few scenes that are cut and edited a little too quickly and some of the lighting in the opening act was a little bright. I’d image It’s hard when you’re shooting scenes in a desolate landscape with the sun beaming down on you and no shade, so I can forgive that.

I think the entire film lacks the suspense and eerieness that something like Vacancy manages to obtain. It’s a combination of the chase before the kill and the acting that is slightly forced when it comes to those emotionally driven scenes when the couples are being “played with” that ends up being the difference. The end of the film was actually the weakest part. I didn’t mind the connection that was made between The Helpers and Claire but the setup for how they ended up at the motel and the way in which the rest of the film unfolds is stretching the plausibility too far. People have been slamming the decisions some of the characters make but guys c’mon?? It’s a horror film, that’s what we watch these things for! or at least I do. It’s not realistic and they don’t always make the right decision because it’s a movie and they can write it anyway they want because it’s not real life (haha).

Honestly guys, The Helpers is just a fun horror film that doesn’t take itself to seriously. It’s a very quick pace, running just 77 minutes and never wears out its welcome. The ending is a little rushed and it’s a far cry from original but if you like Twisted motel flicks like the aforementioned then this is worth your time. A good young cast, great eye candy and some very cool kills. This isn’t the Oscars guys so lower the bar a little and enjoy the ride!

My review for “The Helpers” is 6/10

HELLYFISH

“Hellyfish” is a 12 minute short film written by Patrick Longstreth, it’s also directed by him as well as Robert Mclean. I stumbled across the Imdb page for this cool little creature feature a few months ago. I have to say thanks to Patrick and Robert for allowing me to watch a screener before the films official online release, it’s coming October 24th. Hellyfish is about a nuclear weapon that’s missing and currently leaking radioactive waste into the ocean just off of the coast of Tybee Island, GA. A devastating Jellyfish attack is about to hit a group of unfortunate beach-goers whose day of fun in the sun might be over (haha).

THE GOOD

Hellyfish has a cool and eye-catching 80’s style poster that I hope I can get my hands on at some point. The introduction and closing credits are really cool, like something out of a graphic novel, some very impressive illustrations. The production value of this short is great. It’s got some crisp clear audio dialogue, along with some impressive camera work and editing.

There is some fun, cheesy humorous one liners from several of the different personalities on the beach and some crazy digital effects work on the giant Jellyfish. I particularly enjoyed the final scene with the “Mother” reminded me of another creature feature film called “Frankenfish”. The score was a nice addition too. Everyone involved in this looked like they were having a lot of fun.

THE BAD

Given it’s only 12 minutes long I can’t really say anything was a letdown with Hellyfish. I thought the accents and acting in the opening scene was a bit uneven, but it’s not that important because it’s just the starting point, the real fun follows. I thought the digital gore effects worked well enough because it’s such a short running time but it would have been great to see some cool practical effects, maybe some prosthetics for the wounds.

Hellyfish is a blast! I can’t wait for this thing to go viral on October 24th. For fans of all the creature features like Sharknado etc, are going to dig this. Like most short films they are just that, too short. I think Hellyfish is begging for a full length feature to be made and I’m so onboard with that if and when it comes time! This is the first film for these lads and they do it bloody well!

My rating for “Hellyfish” is 7.5/10

SHOCK VALUE

Firstly I just want to say thankyou to “Jlpublicity’s”, Jacqui and Gregory Goodman the producer of the brand new horror/comedy film “Shock Value”, directed by Douglas Rath. Thanks for allowing me access to the film before its official release, its much appreciated! I have to admit other than having seen a short trailer for “Shock Value” I knew next to nothing about it and I was pleasantly surprised with the end result. It’s a story about a down on his luck, low-budget horror filmmaker named Miles Fowler (played by Zak Hudson). He is having trouble in the romance department as well as getting a new and successful project off the ground. One night when he is feeling particularly voyeuristic at a lover’s lane of sorts, he witnesses a brutal double murder. Rather than immediately calling the cops, Miles along with Justine (Michelle Campbell), his producer and best friend, decide to capitalise on the opportunity to cast a real life serial killer in their next low-budget film.

This also stars Anthony Bravo as Nick (who also wrote the script) along with Janelle Odair, Will Brandt and a cool little cameo from the one and only Malcolm McDowell.

I have seen a few films this year that reminded my of the style Shock Value was aiming for. Cheap Thrills and Maniac are just a couple that spring to mind. The idea itself is a very fresh and fun one. The meager budget (estimated at $150,000) is put to great use and really brings the overall production value right up. This is not a film to be taken to seriously it has a particular subtle brand of a humour similar to that of American Psycho and it never loses its B movie footing.

THE GOOD

The introduction doesn’t mess around as we are introduced to Miles at either the screening of one of his films or a festival of some sort (I’m not too sure about that one). Right off the bat there is some wonderful smooth edits and cuts between the opening scenes along with a very crisp and clear audio track. The sound effects are great too. Several times the score was very reminiscent of some of The Coen Brother’s work, Barton Fink and Fargo sounding. I loved the camera work as well, a lot of really intense close camera work. The film has minimal locations but the surroundings are taken full advantage of. This is the perfect example of a movie within a movie, it knows exactly what it wants to be. I’m sure Douglas and those involved know this isn’t going to be something for everyone, but clearly it’s what it’s the type of film they set out to make. It’s obvious in so much of the tounge in cheek humour to do with all the different facets of making a film with next to no money and or experience. I think it works and it doesn’t ever tip the scale and become too self-indulgent. It doesn’t try hard to be funny it’s a dry style that feels natural.

There is a real solid chemistry amongst the characters as well and I thought everyone pulled their own weight. Zak’s portrayal of Miles gives the audience a sense of sympathy towards his situation but that quickly changes when you see the length’s Miles is willing to go to in order to get what he wants. The standout performance though, comes from Anthony Bravo as the real life psycho Nick. The way in which he is introduced into the story made for some great dry humour. Anthony really nails the role and even though we don’t know everything about Nick or his background or why he is doing the things he is, it still makes for a great watch. This is one of those films where everybody looks like somebody too (haha if that makes sense). I got a young Thomas C Howell meets Casey Affleck vibe from Anthony and Janelle has an Anna Faris look about her, it was oddly distracting but interesting.

THE BAD

Although the audio levels are pretty impressive given the small budget, it does at times get a little loud and overzealous with the sound effects and score in comparison to the actors dialogue levels. A little more editing and that could have been stamped out. I think the second half of the film loses a little bit of momentum and feels a bit under-developed. I found that all the characters weren’t ever really fully explored but maybe that was the point. It does have that surreal feeling about it, I’m just used to characters being really fleshed out and when it’s from point A to point B, I always feel like something is missing.

The actors let themselves down a little bit in the final act as well. I think once the intensity was heightened and the emotions were supposed to come out, it ended up feeling a little bit forced but I also understand this cast doesn’t have a lot of experience so I’m sure they are going to continue to improve. I was hoping for a few more action sequences and more visible gore (that’s just me being a gorehound though). I know the purpose of the film was to make fun of the genre and keep things very satirical a little bit like the film “Chop” from 2009, so it work’s in that sense. I also felt Anthony channeling some Patrick Bateman action… which I dug!!

Shock Value is a technically well made film by a very talented group of people. Sure, it’s illogical and silly but you won’t find too much in the genre that isn’t (haha). If you have read my review you know what you are in for. I’m not sure about the standard for multiple viewings but If you like something a little different that is going to entertain and isn’t your typical slasher-fare or gore based film than I think this is something worth watching. The cast appears to have a lot of fun and this isn’t reliant on “Shock Value” (haha pardon the pun) I can’t wait to see what Douglas and Anthony do next! Well done guys!

My rating for “Shock Value” is 6.5/10

THE EIDOLON STATE

Well I stumbled across this short film on Dreadcentral.com called “The Eidolon State”. I knew next to nothing about the film other than it was inspired by the mythical “Slender Man” (pictured below). The film was co-written and directed by Dion Cavallaro and Paul Thomas and filmed in my hometown of Adelaide in South Australia (small world). Early on in the film, I spotted the roundabout entering the suburb of Gawler which I have been to many a time. It’s great that it’s just their second short film and it’s already getting some great exposure through a well-respected and popular site such as Dreadcentral.

The Eidolon State is about a teenager named Josh, (played by writer/director Paul Thomas himself), who has been experiencing recurring dreams about a faceless man stalking him. Along with his friend Ally (played by Sarah Pike), Josh decides to do some research and find out more about The Slender Man and what his ultimate goal is.

THE GOOD

This 19 minute short film was shot utilising several locations and was estimated to cost around $1,000. The production value is great given the budget and lack of experience. There are only really three people primarily involved in the film too. Paul had a hand in everything from the solid camera work and explosive sound effects to the eerie score and perfect lighting. Clearly he is a jack of all trades and should be someone to keep an eye on in the coming years.

There are a few really masterful suspense moments that are only enhanced due to the subtly of the tension that is built. Combining carefully placed sound effects and lighting changes really helps immerse you in the experience. The tone of this entire short is very creepy. We are introduced to Josh straight away and get a first hand look at what he is going through. The line between his imagination and reality starts to become blurred pretty quickly and we get a look into these events that eventually culminate in a very cool and fitting final scene.The Slender Man is a wonderful myth to explore with this style of filmmaking, I mean who wouldn’t be creeped out by a faceless “man” in a suit, right???

THE BAD

I’m not sure if it was some of the acting or just the fact that I still can’t get my head around our really grating sounding accent (haha). I think it might be a combination of the two aspects that see’s some of the more intense and emotional scenes fall a little flat. The reactions feel a little bit forced as well but keep in mind that these actors/actresses are very inexperienced, so I think overall it’s very solid. I think this short ends before it really begins and just barely scratches the surface of what you could really do with The Slender Man. Given a decent size budget and some more time, I think there is a great scary full length film just waiting to be made, and I for one hope to be a part of it in some way shape or form!

I saw another Australian horror film earlier this year called “The Babadook”, which was a very unnerving and chilling story told in a very cool way. The Eidolon State is every bit as good and deserves plenty of recognition worldwide. Please head over to Dreadcentral or YouTube to watch the film, continue supporting low-budget films like these. From a fellow Adelaideian, I say congrats to Dion and Paul and everyone else involved, great work!!

My rating for “The Eidolon State” is 8/10

WOLFCOP

It was about a year ago that writer/director Lowell Dean released his film “13 Eerie”, a cool zombie facility flick with a modest budget that had a bunch of solid indie film actors such as Katherine Isabelle (American Mary), Brendan Fehr (Adopting Terror), Brendan Fletcher (Rampage) and of course Jesse Moss (Tucker and Dale vs Evil). Lowell is back this year with his brand new werewolf horror/comedy film “WolfCop”. Before I go any further I would like to say a very quick thankyou to Sandra Kusba, she’s the head of the PR team for this film. She sent me a digital screener allowing me to view the film before its official release and I really appreciate it. Anyways onto the film….

WolfCop is a story about Lou Garou (played by Leo Fafard), a small time cop struggling with a drinking problem which affects his work. Plain and simply he just isn’t very good at his job. After a series of strange complaints and some grisly murders Lou discovers that he may have been turned into a werewolf as part of some sinister plan involving the townspeople. Willie (Jonathon Cherry,”Final Destination 2″) is Lou’s only real friend, so the two decide to band together to uncover the mysterious deaths (including Lou’s dad) that have plagued the town for many years. The film also stars Amy Matysio (Sleepwalking and Chained), as Tina, the only real police officer in the town (haha). Along with the stunning Sarah Lind (Edgemont Series and Severed). Aidan Devine, Corinne Conley and Jesse Moss (whom Lowell previously worked with) make appearances too.

THE GOOD

It’s been a long time since anyone has had a new spin on the Werewolf genre. I haven’t seen anything close since that film “Cursed”, up until now that is . This film has a cool and quirky concept that brings something fresh to the genre. The retro poster and artwork for the film definitely peaked my curiosity. This has such a professional production value look to it, once again Dean excels at all the fundamentals. It’s a very quick paced film, the running time just 75 minutes. The stylised editing and rapid scene transitions were as good as anything I have seen given the modest budget of this (which I believe is a lot less than his previous film). The audio and camera work are both executed well and consistent throughout the entire film as well.

The acting from everybody involved is a lot better than most projects of this nature and budget. The success of the film rests on Leo as the WolfCop though. I can safely say that the crew made the correct casting choice because Leo is great. He already has the hairy look and stocky build going for him, add some of the looks he pulls off and you’ve got yourself a winner. Jonathon Cherry is a great addition and provides a lot of the humour with his performance as Willie (not to far removed from his role in FD2). A semi crazy and paranoid man willing to help Lou uncover the truth. He delivers some fun and dry comedy in places where it’s needed. Lastly, the eye candy comes in the form of the gorgeous Sarah Lind. I remember seeing her in a few bits and pieces but not a role as diverse as this one. Think of Megan Fox meets Camilla Luddington with a little Ashley Judd on top and that’s Sarah for you. Not only does she looks unbelievably beautiful (kind of think I’m in love… haha), but she manages to be as convincing as the other secondary characters.

The back story involving the town was sufficient enough for what the story needed and the comedy works in majority of the scenes. There were one or two moments where it went a little Reno 911 overboard and I thought that wasn’t overly realistic but given the story is about a wolfcop, I can probably forgive it (haha). The sound effects and quality of blood and gore really added to the experience too. A couple of really cool practical gags were used that would have been time and money efficient but still managed to look good. I think the choice to use a suit and practical makeup for the wolf was the correct one. Unless you have a big budget and a lot of time, digital effects won’t give you the same look and effect that you might be going for if you do it practically.

THE BAD

I already touched on the unprofessional nature of the cops in one of the scenes that takes place in the restroom of the bar. Other than that there was only one other scene involving some very questionable “love-making” which I thought was just a little too stupid, but it was to set up the following scene. I think they could have found a different way to join the two scenes together though. Lou’s reactions to some of his wounds were also pretty unrealistic. He wouldn’t have to look in order to find something on his body, he would have immediately felt it when he’s moving around. Combine that with the fact that he never panics and seems totally normal about the whole becoming a werewolf thing (haha), I would have probably incorporated at least one freak out scene, because most of us would have that moment. The action sequences involving guns and the look of the shooting mixed with the sound effects was a little bit lame. It reminded me of one of the super low-budget Syfy channel creature feature films. A little bit more time and effort could have been spent on that just to tidy it up.

What can I say WolfCop’s got it all. Shapeshifters, a sexy bartender, a gang of hunters and of course the one and only Wolfcop. It’s a technically flawless and super entertaining film that plays out a little like Harry from “Harry and the Henderson’s” mixed with “Super Troopers” add some good action and gore, it’s ready to serve. It’s even got its own cool theme song performed by Evil Ebenezer and Factor! I just watched Sharknado 2 but I say forget Sharknado because WolfCop steals the show…. I mean “It was a big fucking WolfCop” haha! love that line. Keep your eyes peeled for this indie gem and here’s hoping for a sequel. It’s about to get hairy 😉

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2781516/?ref_=nm_flmg_dr_1

My rating for “WolfCop” is 7.5/10

THE BUNNYMAN MASSACRE

Back in 2011 a film by the name of “Bunnyman” caught a select group of slashers fans eyes, including mine. The reason for that was mostly the ridiculous notion of a man in a soft bunny costume killing teenagers with a chainsaw (haha). I know what your thinking, this sounds similar to a popular franchise we all know doesn’t it? But folks, that’s okay because most of us are not expecting originality within this genre anymore, these days everything has been done to death. It’s been a while since I saw Bunnyman but if my memory serves me correctly I thought it was a very average film. The concept was kind of cool but the execution and entertainment level just didn’t reach any great heights. However, when I found out that Bunnyman 2 was on its way and claiming to deliver everything that the first film didn’t (at least to me), my interest was peaked.

Carl Lindbergh gets behind the camera again in “The Bunnyman Massacre” or “Bunnyman 2” depending on where you are in the world. I won’t talk about the original film so as not to use spoilers for those who haven’t seen it. In this sequel the adventures of Joe (played by David Scott) and Bunnyman (Joshua Lang) roll on, they continue to set up various traps luring tourists and campers into the area hoping to add to their ever-growing pile of bodies. A couple of sisters, Lauren (played by the lovely Jennifer June Ross) and Sarah (Julianne Dowler) are hiking in the nearby woods when they are forced to be part of a sick game of cat and mouse with Joe and his psychotic bunny. It’s a disturbing relationship between Joe and Bunnyman but Joe needs him if he is going to continue to supply the county with his special “beef jerky”.

The film also stars Marshal Hilton, Stephanie Estes, Heather Daley and Jamie Bernadette.

THE GOOD

First of all lets start with this awesome looking 80’s style poster of the Bunnyman and his chainsaw, if that doesn’t get your foot in the door than nothing will. I love the costume, especially the head because every look the bunnyman gives is really left to the viewers imagination. In several scenes he looks sad (if that’s possible haha) but you never really know what he is thinking or feeling. The introduction involves a simple little trap and a school bus full of middle schoolers, I won’t spoil it but I will say it’s a blast. The only film I’ve seen that incorporates a similar scene involving kids was another indie slasher film called “Deadly Detour”. Bunnyman begins by ticking the boxes in the nudity and  body count department. Both of those key ingredients feature in the opening 20 minutes of the film.

The camera work is very crisp and smooth and the audio for the most part is pretty good too. It’s a little inconsistent in a few places but fortunately a lot of the dialogue isn’t that crucial to the details in the story itself. I liked that this was almost a stand alone film, other than a couple of flashbacks in one of Bunnyman’s fits of rage, it’s an entirely separate story. I thought Jennifer June Ross was a delight to watch in the role of Lauren. Lauren is the main protagonist of the film, you can really get behind her and root for her good-natured, fighting spirit. There is no denying the influences Carl must have from The Texas Chainsaw Massacre films, along with plenty of other great 70’s and 80’s films within the genre. Some of the sound effects and score are directly out of TCM there is no denying it, along with introducing the beef jerky supply sub-plot (can anyone say Motel Hell??). It’s one thing to have a nod or two towards what inspires you but you can’t directly use material that’s already been done. Personally it doesn’t really bother me when someone does a bit of cut and paste work just as long as they don’t attempt to pass it off as their own. I don’t think Carl is doing that here and I think it supposed to be pure entertainment and that’s it.

THE BAD

To be completely honest once the credits started rolling I felt a little disappointed. Now that’s not to say the film wasn’t enjoyable and competently made. I think its simply a combination of what I had built up in my head and the lengths that the film goes to too truly entertain, or doesn’t go to in this case. For starters some of the editing is lazy and the way in which the scenes transition, showing views of the horizon and tree leaves swaying in the wind with sped up time, it’s pretty lame to be honest. The suspense in a lot of the action sequences misses the mark as well, it’s something that films of the 80’s did a lot better than modern films. Some opportunities to have kept solid continuity were missed. One scene in particular where a couple of the girls are stopped by Joe and Bunnyman and talked too, then the very next scene they are tied up in the shed. It may have been an idea to incorporate Joe hitting the girls over the head and knocking them out, or anything for that matter just to indicate to the audience what went down.

I’m a huge fan of inventive kills with the chainsaw and although this one has enough action with the weapon itself, I would like to have seen them executed better. You can often tell the chainsaw is by the side of the actor and someone is just squeezing the blood out of a tube from outside the frame. I’m not sure of the total budget for this film but early on several kill scenes have great practical effects and blood spraying on the camera etc. So my question is why resort to cheap CGI blood later in the film?? why not continue using the real stuff and do some gags with a full body cast or prop stomachs or heads? there is a bunch of different and cool things that you can do, so I’m not sure why the crew made some of the choices they did.

The films main issues are the inconsistencies in the acting from most of the cast and the plot itself. For example, David Scott playing Joe is solid for the most part. But I’m not sure if it’s the accent he uses or a combination of things but he lacks the real menace that you expect from your despicable character (think TCM Sheriff Hoyt). Don’t get me wrong there is nothing to like about the character of Joe, he has no redeemable qualities but he needed to be much more of a hard man played with more grit. Some of the girls overact as well and fail to deliver the more emotional scenes convincingly. In a purely fun low-budget movie I expect these sorts of issues though. The other problem is that the story lacks any real clear plot. It’s almost like they had the two evil characters, a group of girls and then said lets just kill a bunch of people (haha). Now that’s okay but you need to incorporate some kind of clear narrative so the audience knows where the story is going. Because when you expect a really cool showdown in the last act you end up getting a rushed flat and non thought out ending that leaves things on a disappointing note.

Let’s face it, “The Bunnyman Massacre” probably isn’t going to win any awards but does that mean you shouldn’t watch it?? hell no! It’s technically well made, you get a killer that’s going to be remembered for years to come and some great early kill sequences with some cool practical effects. I just wish the second half of the film had the execution that the first half had. I say it again, if you have the money and time to do things practically please do! Die hard fans of the genre are going to love you for it. This could have reached the heights of “Wrong Turn” with plenty more carnage and red stuff but still, If you want 85 minutes of silly fun go pick up a copy of The Bunnyman Massacre below.

My rating for “The Bunnyman Massacre” is 6/10

DEAD SNOW 2: RED VS DEAD

Hey everyone, it’s been a while but I’m back with a new review. Speaking of a while, its been 5 years since Tommy Wirkola (director of “Hansel and Gretel Witch Hunters”) came onto the scene with his Norwegian gorefest  “Dead Snow”. I only saw the original film recently and it will definitely go down as a cult classic in my eyes. It was a great blend of european comedy and splattered zombies in the familiar cabin setting. So you can imagine my excitement for the much-anticipated sequel “Dead Snow 2: Red Vs Dead”. Those of you that have seen the original film will be glad to know that our hero Martin (played by Vegar Hoel) and the general zombie master Herzog (Orjan Gamst) return to do battle with one another. The film also stars actors from the US, (Martin Starr from “Knocked Up”) as Daniel, the leader of the zombie squad. Along with Jocelyn DeBoer and Ingrid Haas.Those of you who haven’t seen the first film, please stop reading my review and go and pick yourself up a copy, it’s well worth it!

To make sure I don’t spoil the events of the first film I will just start by saying the sequel picks up exactly where the first film left off but this time the setting is much more suburban. The blend from the 2009 film into the sequel was really smooth and I enjoyed watching a few of the flashbacks from the first film. Martin is trying to escape the mountains and countryside and head to some kind of safety when he ends up crashing his car (in a slightly lame way if you ask me). From there, he discovers that the authorities think he’s responsible for the deaths of his friends and girlfriend so he chooses to head to a nearby town hoping to find out what the Nazi-zombies are up to. What he finds is a brand new army of undead that need to fulfill their final mission, capturing the small town of Talvik.

THE GOOD

The development of the story and background information surrounding the Nazi zombies and what they did when they were alive was featured much more heavily in this follow-up film. I know a lot of horror/gorehound fans probably don’t care about the plot details, but even something as ludicrous as this script needs to have some form of a story. Very much like the first film the production values are great. The audio levels and camera work are both very sharp. I read this had a budget of $30 million dollars as opposed to the first film which barely had a million dollars. I’m not sure if that is correct but if so that proves how much of a success the first film was. The crew was clearly able to do a lot more with this one though.

The attention to detail in some of the practical effects and the zombie makeup was impressive. Sure, majority of the kills are enhanced with digital effects and certain things that would have taken a lot more time to do practically and some probably couldn’t have been done. None the less it all looks pretty good. I love this new age blend of dark/dry comedy crossed with the blood and gore. We can all thank Peter Jackson, he is the reason these types of films are getting made. The suspenseful score works well when Herzog is showing how truly menacing that horrific face of his is but then he will do something like his Hitler salute and it will contain some random comedy, I dig that kind of stuff! There are plenty of moments of comedic relief in this one, so don’t worry. I think they hit the mark a little bit better with that aspect this time around. The acting is also pretty solid. It’s great to see Vegar back again, I’ve really grown to love the Martin character. When he’s not killing Nazi’s he’s a little awkward when it comes to knowing what to say, which just makes the humor that much more fun

The anti is upped in the sequel with plenty of cool additions to the script. There are three Americans that make up the “Zombie Squad”, I didn’t see the story going in that direction so that was really cool. A few pop culture references to current zombie related rules etc. Characters have powers that we never knew about as well as the addition of a couple of cool arms making for some really great humour as well as a couple of unique deaths. It’s these cool little quirks and the attention to detail in some of the kills that makes this movie 100 minutes of pure entertainment.

THE BAD

I can’t say anything much is wrong with Dead Snow 2. As long as you know what you are in for (which most people do) I think you should have a lot of fun and don’t take it seriously… like at all…. I mean like at all (haha). The only thing I can say that could have used some work would be the body count (the amount we see that is) and the quality of the splatter effects (if you have seen it you are probably thinking what Adam? as if…) But seriously I was really hoping this would go ridiculously overboard with splatter and gore effects, decapitation etc a little more like the second half of the first film.

With a story like this you can take as much liberty as you want with the amount of carnage you choose to set up and show. Maybe my hopes were built up a little to high for this one but I feel like they almost didn’t do enough. I think the first film takes a lot longer to get to the action but when it does it hits home a lot harder than this one, so that’s a little dissapointing.That and a very odd, darkly comedic (maybe?? I don’t really get it) ending that I don’t think adds anything to the mix, everything else works just fine though.

Dead Snow 2: Red Vs Dead achieves exactly what it set out to do and that’s to entertain gorehounds for 100 minutes and I think for the most part it does that. It has the small town vibe of Edgar Wright’s film “Hot Fuzz” the odd humour of “Idle Hands” and the splatter of Peter Jackson’s “Braindead”. Maybe I’m just being too fussy but I wanted to see non stop carnage that never lets up and puts everything else to shame and I didn’t quiet get that. However, your unlikely to see anything come out in the next year or two that you can have as much fun with as this.

My review for “Dead Snow 2: Red vs Dead” is 7.5/10

THE ROVER

“The Rover” is the latest Aussie film from David Michod, director of the Australian crime film “Animal Kingdom”.You can imagine after the success of Animal Kingdom the hype surrounding David’s follow-up film and working with Guy Pearce again. The Rover is in the vein of films like Mad Max and the post apocalyptic survival film “The Road”. 10 years after a global economic collapse, a hardened ruthless loner (Guy Pearce), tracks down three men who have stolen his car, his only possession. The stranger navigates through rural South Australia and its desolate landscape with Ray (Robert Pattinson), the wounded brother of Henry (Scoot Mcnairy), one of the men who stole his car.

I saw the film last night and I have very mixed feelings toward it. On one hand I thought it was competently made and showcased The Flinders Rangers and rural South Australia realistically. It conveyed how unforgiving some of the terrain and environment can be. But on the other hands it’s a very slow, bleak and unsympathetic story that has no clear purpose.

THE GOOD

The look and sounds of the film were great. The camera work effectively conveys the desolate landscape that our loner finds himself in. A number of scenes in the first and second acts contain really good lighting or should I say, lack there of, making some of the internal shots and the use of shadows very memorable. The subtle nuances in the chilling and unnerving bass/strings score was also a pleasant surprise. The strongest aspect of the film is the acting. I never tire of seeing Guy Pearce in these types of lead roles. He continues to involve himself in Australian projects which is great for everyone involved. Most of the actors that make it in Hollywood never look back so it’s nice to keep one!

Guy is fantastic as this hardened man who appears to have lost everything and is struggling to find his way back to some sort of life. His look was that of a tired rough man, covered in flies and heavily bearded. Topped off with a combination of anguish, regret and anger written all over his face. He maintains the intensity the character requires for the entire running time. The emotionally driven scenes that he was involved in were perfect. Robert Pattinson (best known for the Twilight series), is a solid counterpart as Ray, a very misguided and troubled young man. I think Rob probably did all he could do with this one-dimensional dim-witted character. I think some of his dialogue was pretty muffled (the Texan accent didn’t help), It was hard to understand and his character was just plain dumb. Not much he had to say about anything gave me more of an understanding about who he was or where he had come from. It was disappointing because the success of the film hinges on that.

THE BAD

Unfortunately there isn’t an interesting enough story here. Underneath it all this is a film set in a harsh environment that depicts some of the worst of humanity. Maybe It’s a little bit of a social commentary on where the world might be heading in the future, or at least parts of it. It’s a very slow and grim film that lacks much-needed character development through a lot more dialogue. This amount of mystery and withheld information regarding our two key characters and what they have been through, and are currently going through is the main issue with the film. Minimal dialogue can work sometimes if the emotional punch is their and the scene only requires a look or a certain mannerism. Lack of dialogue can even help build suspense in the right scenario, sadly that isn’t the case with The Rover.

Speaking of suspense, you would aspect with all the eerie sound effects and vast decaying landscape that tension would be at an all time high, alas. Other than one scene at a motel room, The Rover fails to generate any kind of suspense or tension which of course is a key component with these types of Crime/Drama films. The duo of The Loner and Ray is so crucial and it doesn’t really work. I found it hard to believe that these two would have anything in common just from looking at them, regardless of the fact that I didn’t know anything about them until three-quarters way through the film. The character of Ray just isn’t explored at all. Was he a product of a bad upbringing? His brother’s influence? The situation the world was in? or something completely unrelated, I’m not sure about anything. There didn’t have to be any definitive answers, I understand most things are not black and white but they have to at least be partially explored to maintain a level of realism.

The saving grace comes in the form of Guy Pearce’s character because at least he does develop and open up somewhat as the film draws to a close. I’m still not sure there was ever a motive for him tracking these men down. Taking the actions that he does throughout the entire film just to get his car back seems like a lot of work, and maybe just some lazy writing. It’s easy to incorporate another reason for his actions, I suppose we are lead to believe in a world gone to hell you don’t take any crap from anyone when it’s all you have. That’s okay in theory but he has another vehicle that he can get around (haha) and does so for the remainder of the film. There needed to be more, much more to it than just that. The development doesn’t come from anything Guy says, it’s more in his demeanor. For some unknown reason he has sympathy for Ray, either that or he can understand and relate to his situation. My issue is that the two never actually have a conversation long enough to divulge anything really personal about the other and that just seems unrealistic, especially in a world where all you really have left is conversation. The loner seemed far to trusting of Ray when it came to carrying a gun, no one that unpredictable would be given free rein of things, so to speak. I just don’t understand the relationship between the two at all. When the climax of the film rolls around your still left thinking what just happened? and why did it happen? It’s a very sudden and bland ending to 108 minutes with no one really understanding anymore than they did before the whole thing started.

Quentin Tarantino called “The Rover” the best Australian film. He said the same about “Big Bad Wolves” calling it best film of the year and it was one of them for sure. The Rover however is not. Everything from a technical point of view is very impressive and the actors give everything they have got, Pearce is wonderful. All that aside though, it just doesn’t have the required amount of character development and clear purpose that a film like this needs to have to work. To much time is spent looking at the landscape, wide shots driving down open roads and the short pointless conversations that in the end just add up to fluff and expand the running time. No Country For Old Men this is not, is it worth a watch though? Yes. It showcases our country and the state of SA and contains some top-notch acting, but that’s about all it contains.

My rating for “The Rover” is 5.5/10

KIDS GET DEAD 2: THE KIDS GET DEADER

Just like I said I would, here is the new review for Michael Hall’s much-anticipated sequel to the 2009 film Kids Go To The Woods… Kids Get Dead, Kids Get Dead 2: The Kids Get Deader. The following will contain a few minor spoilers, so if you haven’t seen the first film and you are going too, please stop reading now. The film starts off exactly where the first film finished. On one side of the coin our young heroin Casey (played by Leah Rudick), is now on medication and experiencing vivid nightmares of the masked killer that massacred all of her friends and her brother Scott. Charles Carver (Steve Buja) was the author of the book that Scott was reading in the first film. Casey tracks him down hoping to find some answers, meanwhile the killer has found his way to a local house party where a new group of teens will meet their fate. The showdown between Casey and the killer is inevitable as she looks to seek retribution for her brother’s death. The film stars Lauren Maslanik, Vonka Romanoff, Ryan Curtis, Andrew Saunders, Shane Dorman, Sam Albertsen, Magan Krache and many more.

Everyone knows that I’m a massive fan of the slasher film when it’s executed well. There are several key do’s and don’ts when it comes to this genre. They involve keeping your running time down and your body count high, along with the addition of plenty of nudity and gore. Times have changed since the tame days of the 80’s and 90’s but it’s nice to see a nod at the types of films that today’s movie makers are modeling their own projects on and Kids Get Dead 2 does exactly that. “Ticks all the boxes when it comes to boobs, blood and babes”

THE GOOD

This time around I have to say I really enjoyed the character of Peaches McNeil who hosts this sequel. I’m not sure who the actress is, as she is not listed. However, she provides some fantastic eye candy with her luscious lips (amongst other things haha). Not only that, she had some great comedic timing and a real fun nature about her. That was the aspect of the first film that I didn’t appreciate but this time around it was a blast! Once again the technical aspects are without fault, which is unheard of considering the amount of experience from this group. The opening credits are really well put together and the camera work leading into the first few shots of the film were particularly memorable and help set up what can be a great viewing experience. I like it when camera’s are moving subtly upward from people’s feet and shooting unique angles. The suspenseful score was a bit better this time around as well, not perfect but a solid backing.

A more professional cast were involved in this follow-up, the first film had actors with good chemistry but lacking consistency. I’m not sure that a lot of experience was added to the mix but everyone really seemed on point this time. The girls are all fantastic and very memorable too. The characters of Monica, Cindy and Stephanie had their own little quirks and unique style, from dress code down to mannerisms all of them were equally sassy and sexy. Played respectively by Vonka Ramonoff, Megan Krache and Lauren Maslanik (who I must say strikes quite a resemblance to a friend of mine haha). The performances of all three were really solid. Vonka reminded me a lot of a younger Ellen Page. Her wild side bought out the bitch in her but she seemed a nice girl at heart. Lauren as Stephanie was the standout, she played the innocent girl pretty well considering that when she is all done up she looks stunning and not nerdy in the slightest! All the acting, including the characters that make up the young horny male teens had that certain camp value but took it serious at all the right moments. The constant Karate Kid references were hilarious, keep an ear out for them because I don’t want to spoil the fun.

The first film had a budget of only around $10,000. I imagine this follow-up doesn’t have a lot more funding but I’m guessing a little bit. It’s leaps and bounds above any production value that I have seen in low-budget filmmaking. This looks somewhere in between 100,000- 500,000 and you can bet your bottom dollar that it’s not, everything about this just screams professional. Now you all want to know If i watch Kids Get Dead 2 will it deliver with the red stuff?? Safe to say, yes it does! and then some….

This is 90 minutes of balls to the wall blood and gore with some of the most inventive kills that will impress anyone who knows anything about slasher films and how much work goes into setting up a good gag. It has a very high-body count, stabbings, strangulation and decapitation are amongst some of the deaths, they are all unique in their own ways. I don’t want to ruin any of the surprise moments but I have to share with you one standout scene. It involves a lawnmower that will bring you as close to Peter Jackson’s “Braindead” as you could get in the last 20 plus years.

The kills are relentless, Michael delivers them at break neck speed. Filmmakers and Directors reading this, please take note. Inside the first 15 minutes it’s a must to have a couple of really fun and gory kills to kick-start the precedings, exhibit A “Kids Get Dead 2”. The longer you wait the more impatient and disinterested your audience will become. Not only are there a bucket load of kills in this one, 90 percent of them involve fantastic practical blood and gore effects. I’m going to plug Bec Fordyce (who also appears in the film at the beginning) and Rich Catino who were the key/special makeup effects artists on this film. Major props guys! If there are independent awards going out for this aspect of filmmaking, you guys both deserve them. This is hands down the best effects I have seen in a film of this budget and I watch a lot of this stuff, so well done!

THE BAD

I don’t have much to say from a bad perspective when it comes to Kids Get Dead 2. The points that stood out to me were all very minor compared to the first film, which I still very much enjoyed. I think changing the look of the killer for the second film worked but Michael should have kept the same actor, otherwise you might have a hard time buying the aspect of the film with Casey that was carried over from the original. The suspense during some of the action sequences didn’t quiet hit the mark. Holding back before the killer strikes is a better way to deliver the action. I wasn’t clear on the relevance of the introduction to the new characters, I suppose it’s not important though. It’s a slasher film so at some point we expect immature jocks and hot girls right?? (haha). It might have been a nice touch if somehow they were connected though. I think when it comes to Carver, the author of the book, their needed to be a scene incorporated into the film where Casey does her research and looks him up. She kind of just ends up in this dark unit where she meets him, it was all a bit rushed. Other than one small piece of mediocre CGI involving a car explosion (which I know is clearly a budget restraint issue), the rest of the bigger effects are handled perfectly.

In my opinion, Kids Get Dead 2: The Kids Get Deader is the best 80’s/90’s inspired slasher film that you’re likely to ever see for this kind of money. Michael Hall and his entire team should be the benchmark of the genre and budget. Anyone looking to make a film of this nature look no further, watch and learn. Everything you need to know is rolled into this 90 minutes of pure entertainment. I doubt I will see a slasher film this good again for a very long time, if ever. If anyone involved with the film, actors or cast want to get in touch with me you can do so through Facebook or email at lcapweb@hotmail.com, I would love the chance to write a cool little quote to use as a promotional tool. Hit me up the second a blu ray/dvd is available and ship it straight over to Australia so I can get watching again! brilliant… just brilliant

My rating for “Kids Get Dead 2: The Kids Get Deader” is 8/10

AWAY FROM HERE

Away From Here was formerly known as “The Boarding House” was shot way back in 2011/2012 I think? And it’s only now just beginning to surface through Video on Demand and Itunes. I have been following the progression of the film for the last two years with a very keen interest in everything Nick Stahl does. I think he is a brilliant and underrated actor that sadly has suffered from a lot of personal problems over the last five or so years. This is currently his last completed film.

Away From Here is a story about James (played by Stahl), a convicted sex offender that has spent the last 6 years behind bars. He was having a secret affair with the 15-year-old daughter of the pastor that had mentored him. Upon his release, James decides to return home and move on with his life. He obtains a job at a local diner where gets involved with Lily (played by “Justified’s” Alicia Witt) a young waitress and attempts to reconnect with his family. His past, in the form of now 21-year-old Jessica (Mary Boies) along with her father are not prepared for his return. How will James cope and will he ever be able to move on with his life? The film also stars Ray Wise and Frankie Faison.

I was very keen to see this because firstly, it’s a very tricky ane edgy subject matter that divides a lot of people, especially when you throw religion and the church into the equation. Secondly, these types of darker roles are Nick’s forte. All you have to do is take a look at some of his previous work like Bully, The Chameleon and The Burning Palms. They are just a few from his resume.

THE GOOD

The first thing that really stands out about Away From Here is the exceptional job of casting for these characters, primarily James and Lily. If that chemistry or relationship breaks down or doesn’t work than neither does the film. Nick is wonderful as James, in the beginning of the film you don’t really know why he is in trouble you just know that he is. I think he is able to convey a lot through emotion and facial expression without having to say much. I draw comparisons between Stahl and Ryan Gosling, sure Gosling has the muscles and the pretty boy looks to go with the talent but Nick definitely matches him with that edge factor and ability to play just about any type of role. Alicia Witt is another great find. She started acting at such a young age Dune was very early on followed by American Girl and Urban Legend and I have followed her ever since. She really hits her straps as Lily. The pain she is feeling is written all over her face and the emotional scenes involving her pack quiet a punch.

When you add “Twin Peak’s” Ray Wise and “Banshee’s” Frankie Faison as Paul (Wise) the pastor from James church and Carl (Faison) the owner of the diner, you have a great ensemble. I thought Ray Wise was very good. He has a wonderful voice for narration and of course he gets the chance to show that off with the sermon in the beginning and closing of the film. I liked that the religious aspect wasn’t overbearing, me being an atheist and all that can sometimes be the downfall with a film like this. It needs to be somewhat neutral to have the best chance of appealing to a wider audience. The technical aspects are all very solid too. The camera work is nice and smooth with a lot of close personal shots from conversations in cars as well as on the streets of the town. The audio is crisp and clear so no problems there either.

The films most powerful moments happen between James and Lily. It’s an odd pairing but it works. Both of them are very reserved and seem to be withholding information from each other. It’s realistic in a way but frustrating as a viewer because you just want both of them to open up and to explore more about who they are. The emotionally intense scenes work really well but I also found it difficult to watch them in conversation because they were both so awkward.

THE BAD

Away From Here despite it’s professional aesthetic appeal, lacks in clarity and substance within the storytelling. I discovered early on that this was going to be a very simple story. There is nothing wrong with simple, some of the best films I have seen have been just that. However, these types of films need to have layers. The characters need to be explored to the fullest. I know it’s probably not like that in real life but this is 90 minutes of entertainment, or should be. A subject matter as dark as this needs more explaining and resolution. In the beginning we see a man and younger girl kissing on a peer and then we are given the “6 Years Later” phrase. My question is 6 years later from what? It’s a very strange way to open a film. I’m not saying give the audience everything all at once but you need to have some kind of event, something that takes place that gives what your about to see some context.

It’s a very slow film to boot. Even after James is released from prison and attempts to reintegrate into society it still lags. The film is only 82 minutes long but there were countless opportunity’s to fix the missing scenes that could have helped advance the story and the character development. You can see in part how these people came to be where they are but the particulars require you to draw your own ideas and conclusions. It’s also a very forward meeting and quick relationship development between James and Lily. Neither of them really found out anything about each other before sort of labelling themselves as partners, I didn’t find that overly realistic. There was no temptation for James to do the wrong thing, which led me to believe that his affair with Jessica was a one-off and that he wasn’t your typical sex offender.

I also figured there would be a moment where people would discover James past and that it would come back to haunt him. The moral thing to do would be to disclose what you have done, but I suppose you would be judged immediately on your past, as shown throughout other parts of the film. I thought if you went on the sex offender registry and you were living in a small town that it would be bigger news when you were released. Something like his re-entry into society would have been reported on in the newspaper, not just locals seeing him out and about, how would they even know who he was?? Jessica played by Mary had her fair share of emotional scenes and she really impressed me with them, such strong acting for someone so young. I was disappointed that Nick wasn’t given the same shining moments. Some of his best work comes from an emotional breakdown or a really angry response. I always think of his scenes with Dennis Hopper (R.I.P) in the film “Sleepwalking”, I was hoping for some more of that here.

Away From Here is not a bad film, by any means. It’s got a great cast, a simple but interesting story and all the technical strengths those interested in the art of filmmaking want to see. What it doesn’t have is a clear narrative or message. What is this film really trying to say about sex offenders? Is it about the system? The unfair nature in which people are treated and the inability to move on with their lives because of that treatment? Maybe none of that or maybe all of it, I don’t really know. What I do know is that this was a solid idea that was only half explored and that it’s not a film for those involved with the church or organised religion. I’m a huge fan of Nick’s and appreciate everything that he does, I was really hoping for a hidden gem here but honestly I left a little disappointed.

If you are a fan of any of the cast or you enjoy character study pieces, this is worth a look. Just don’t expect anything to really leave an impression on you.

My rating for “Away From Here” is 5.5/10

KIDS GO TO THE WOODS… KIDS GET DEAD

Before I even get started with the review for this debut 80’s style slasher film from first time director Michael Hall, just look at that artwork! What a fantastic movie title and concept artwork from those involved with this independent slasher. This was officially released back in 2009. I purchased the dvd several months ago but have just now got around to watching it.

Kids Go To The Woods, Kid’s Get Dead is a slasher film that pays homage to everything you have seen in this genre over the last 30 years. It’s Casey’s (Leah Rudick) birthday and her boyfriend’s best friend has organised a relatives cabin situated in the woods so the group can celebrate the occasion with a weekend away. Along for the ride is Casey’s boyfriend Derrick (Eric Carpenter) his best friend Brad, his girlfriend Heather and their lesbian friends Jill and Lisa. Scott is Casey’s nerdy brother he begrudgingly tags along. Before they arrive they are warned by ex-vietnam vet and local store clerk Llyod (Kevin Shea), about kids who have disappeared in the area recently. However, the group doesn’t think anything of it until events in a slasher novel Scott is reading start to come true and someone is out to kill in these woods. This is a comedy/horror film that parodies all the familiar tropes we see in this genre and it knows that’s exactly what it is.

The film also stars Andrew Waffenschmidt, Joseph Campellone, Carly Goodspeed, Meghan Miller, Amanda Rising and many more.

THE GOOD

Like I said there is a great catchy title and some killer artwork that really help market this low-budget slasher film. Kids Go To The Woods manages to earn respect through its technical aspects of filmmaking more so than the story itself, at least in my opinion. The camera work is very impressive given the lack of experience and micro-budget. Fyi, anyone interested in learning how to shoot a campfire scene have a word to Michael Hall, because he can show you how it’s done. There are countless number of low-budget slasher films that incorporate the cliché campfire scene and get it oh so wrong two things normally happen the camera zooms up far too close to the actor’s faces and the noise from the crackling fire overpowers the dialogue audio. Speaking of audio, its crystal clear in this one. Even when characters are conversing with each other out of the frame, you can still hear what’s being said and that is very rare. It’s also very smooth in transitioning between scenes.

I found the cast mostly convincing in their respective roles. You can tell these actors and actresses lack experience but they make up for it with natural chemistry amongst the group. The film has a certain amount of campyness to it, but it works. The professionalism mostly shines through in the work behind the scenes and the great production value. This is estimated at around $10,000 and it feels like ten times that budget, you would never know, so don’t let the lack of money put you off. I thought the blood and gore effects were mostly pretty good. I think the action scenes and various ways in which the characters are killed off could have been changed somewhat, but overall it’s really fun and there is plenty of the red stuff!

THE BAD

Most of what we get in Kids Go To The Woods is impressive but not all of it. I think even though its only around 82 minutes, it lags in the middles of the film. Half of the cheesy Pg-13 dialogue could have been cut between the second and third acts. Once the final act rolls around the climax with Casey and our masked killer seems to go on and on too. The several attempts to kill him become a little more far-fetched than first thought because he just won’t die! I think that the character of Candy Adams was played well by Goodspeed but it added nothing to the mix other than a bit of extra eye candy (pardon the pun haha) I think it was mostly just a nod from Michael’s days of watching cable slasher movies. I am not from the United States so we have never had that here. To be honest that aspect of the film took me out of it several times and distracted me from what was otherwise a very entertaining flick.

I think both the music choices and score were very bland. There wasn’t anything that stood out to me in that department, which is disappointing. It would have been great to hear a 70’s and 80’s synth style backing track. A lot of the comedy also becomes a little crass after a while and it can be a very hard thing to write successfully into a horror script. It shows here with some of it definitely missing the mark. Personally I didn’t have an issue with the look of the killer but it’s hard not to draw a huge comparison between this film and the 80’s classic “My Bloody Valentine”. The costume department could have at least tried something a little different with the look(haha). Majority of the characters were really fun to sit back and watch but the credibility was stretched with the character of Scott. I mean no single person is that stupid and puts up with that amount of crap from somebody, no matter who they are trying to please. It’s a movie though so I guess I can swallow that.

Kids Go To The Woods… Kids Get Dead takes me back to the wonder that was 80’s low-budget filmmaking. Some of my favourite films of the genre come from that time period, sadly I didn’t see most of them until the 90’s due to being a product of the latter. This has pretty much everything you want to see as a fan of the genre. Support these low-budget indie films because there are a bunch of hidden gems out there, you just need to know where to look. Below is a link to the film, do yourself a favor and pick up a copy and keep on the look out for my next review of “Kids Get Dead 2” the 2014 follow-up!

My rating for “Kids Go To The Woods.. Kids Get Dead” is 6/10

MURDERDROME

This is a brand new review for what is destined to be an Aussie cult classic film  called “Murderdrome”. It’s written and directed by Daniel Armstrong. It’s a film that showcases the sport of Roller Derby in a Supernatural/Grindhouse revenge flick scenario. Cherry Skye (played by the gorgeous Amber Sajben), is an avid Roller Derby enthusiast. She is given a locket from Brad (Jake Brown), a young man who has taken a liking to her. Brad’s jealous ex girlfriend Hell Grazer (played by Rachael Blackwood) is determined to make Cherry’s life a living hell (pardon the pun haha). What none of the Roller Derby girls and co know is that a malevolent demon who is hungry for human souls has been released from the locket and it’s collection time.

The film also stars Kat Anderson, Anthony Cincotta, Max Marchione, Daisy Masterman, Pepper Minx and Louise Monnington.

I liked the Facebook page for the film a while back and have been patiently waiting for the Dvd release. It looked to have a Ryan Nicholson’s “Gutterballs” feel to it, with that Psychedelic soundtrack and retro underground feel I was hoping for solid gold and what I got was pretty good stuff.

THE GOOD

Firstly will say that I have no idea what the hell this thing was really about (haha) and I don’t care because honestly, it’s just fun. It’s a well written script with enough campy humour and action sequences to satisfy most of its target audience. The camera work is very impressive, some nice swift shots of alley ways and the streets of what I think is Melbourne??, not too sure because their isn’t a location mentioned on the official Imdb page. This is a micro-budget film (estimated budget value is at just $6,000) but it feels like ten times that budget, some really well thought out ways of cutting down on costs resulting in great production values. The girls all look great and the costumes are a blast as well. I really like Amber in the lead role of Cherry. Her personality shines right through and she looks like she is having a blast doing this. These girls all felt very real, I like that they weren’t your obvious beauties in the generic sense of the word. In this environment that wouldn’t have been very realistic so I’m glad they found these really sassy chicks!

The acting is nothing fantastic but it’s got the right amount of camp value that you can get on board with, the cast and crew are just having a lot of fun with it. I think its more during the emotionally driven scenes that the acting feels a little hollow and somewhat forced but for the most part it’s alright. The soundtrack is worth mentioning too. There are lots of really cool indie/hard rock and psychedelic kind of songs that really fit the structure of the scenes and of course it helps independent musicians get exposure they otherwise wouldn’t have gotten.

The effects in Murderdrome are really fun as well. You get a really cool decapitation scene along with some nice blade incisions, amongst some other really cool deaths as well. I’m a big fan of practical effects though and most of what we see here is CGI orientated. However, due to the extremely limited funds for this project I can see why Daniel and Co. opted for the digital effects and I can respect that.

THE BAD

There isn’t a lot of negativity when it comes to Murderdrome. I do think that the audio could have used a bit of work here and there though. It’s just a little inconsistent in places but having spoken to a few sound engineers and such I hear it’s one of the hardest things to get right. I also found the opening credits and some of the roller derby footage to drag on a little too long. It could have been cut in half, even though they clearly wanted to showcase the sport it does cut into time that could have been spent on a few more action sequences or a higher body count.

Honestly, I wasn’t a huge fan of the supernatural aspect either. I didn’t think it was the direction the film was going to take. Not that a film like this has a lot of logic anyways but some of the details about how and why this is taking place kind of get lost in translation. It’s still a fun idea but I think this almost would have worked better as a roller derby team vs another team revenge flick, and left the supernatural element out. Some of the fight choreography was pretty lame and the heaven/after life sequence didn’t really add much to the equation, but I suppose I’m being a little critical. There is nothing wrong with those scenes they just didn’t do much for me.

Overall, Murderdrome was a blast. it’s just a really fun messed up kind of film (haha). Like I said, I’m a stickler for details when it comes to sound and of course the effects. In a film of this nature it needs a hard R rating. I think Murderdrome was begging for a higher body count and more brutality. Some of the comedy that falls flat and the few scenes that didn’t enhance the entertainment value, could have been swapped for some more of the red stuff! All in all Daniel and Co. I say well done! you have made a cool little gem of a film with money you wouldn’t have change from after buying a Meat Pie and a Powerade from any “On The Run” (haha) I recommend this film for anyone that wants a good time without having to call the next day, click below and go!

My rating for “Murderdrome” is 6/10

BLOOD SOAKED

Firstly I want to do a quick shout out to Peter Grendle (director of Blood Soaked) and the entire team involved with the film for allowing me to watch an online screener prior to the films official release date. For those of you interested in checking it out, the following is the link for a Region 1 Dvd of the film. It’s available from June 17th

http://www.amazon.com/Blood-Soaked-Laina-Cathryn-Grendle/dp/B00ID8HE2I.

Blood Soaked is a 70’s style low-budget exploitation/grindhouse film from Wildeye Releasing. It’s a film about a lesbian college couple that become stranded in the middle of nowhere after they hit an animal with their car. What the girls don’t know is that two twisted Neo-Nazi sisters, who have been breeding zombies with a special formula are determined to see the girls captured and tested. It stars Kevin Wester, Heather Wilder, Rachel Corona and Laina Grendle. Peter made a short film back in 2008 called “This Side Of Nightmare” which contained the basic elements and plot structure of what is now “Blood Soaked” a full length feature. After having seen the film I can’t help but wonder why it wasn’t left as a short film.

THE GOOD

Heading into any film with any type of budget for that matter, I always try to find positive things to say about any aspects of the film and sometimes that is difficult to do. “Blood Runs Cold”, “A Cadaver Christmas”, “The Cook” and “The Porkchop Trilogy” are just a few of the many micro budget films that I have watched and really enjoyed, so like I said the money issue has very little to do with it.

A couple of the girls that were cast in Blood Soaked really seem to have a lot of personality and look great as well, so that was something. There is also a bunch of great rock/punk and metal style songs throughout the film that I really enjoyed hearing. The films strongest aspect is definitely the cool use of black and white, which is primarily in the second half. I’m not sure about the reasons for switching to black and white but it doesn’t really bother me because I thought it was quiet effective.

THE BAD

Now comes the part I really don’t like. Unfortunately you do see your fair share of failed attempts in low-budget filmmaking, especially when it involves people with little to no experience. Where do I start with Blood Soaked? I guess at its core it’s a revenge flick with a bit of a nod to similar films within the genre like “Dear God No” and “Nora!”. Ultimately though it has no real story or plot, at least none that you could care about. I couldn’t make out many details about the story, like whether the father was killed by the two sisters after being experimented on or was he killed during Hitler’s regime?? As far as I could see it was basically two crazy Neo-Nazi sisters trying to turn people into zombies in order to create some sort of army?? I couldn’t make heads or tails of it, it was very bizarre even for this style of film.

Aside from a non-existent story the film has technical issues galore. I understand some of that is down to experience and not just budgetary constraints. The camera work from the outset is fiercely shaky, however it does improve as the film progresses. There was even movement during what was supposed to be still shots inside the bunker/house, and that too me is film 101, the basics. The audio was very crackly in several scenes and at times unbearable in its inconsistency between the bass and sound effects comparable with how very hollow and quite the dialogue was. The score was another thing that was really uninspiring, where was the music to carry the tension?? It’s also very poorly lit inside the bunker scenes, along with some choppy and repetitive editing between scenes, relaying the same shot before a new scene started. All the technical aspects I felt were very amateurish. I think there is a lot of room for improvement in Peter’s next project.

The actors/actresses probably did the best with what they were given but most of the more intense emotional scenes felt really forced. Between the lame fight sequences and overbearing hysteria and screaming that would then all of a sudden cease. It became difficult to concentrate on what was really taking place. I didn’t find Sadie or her sister menacing in the slightest and considering they were supposed to be truly evil and sadistic, somehow it got lost in the delivery. Lastly, I was hoping Blood Soaked would at least have some really cool practical gore effects but alas it didn’t. I know sometimes that can be down to practicality and budget/time constraints. But I can’t think of any one gag in this film that was something worth mentioning. For what was marketed as a 70’s style sleazy grindhouse throwback failed to deliver on any of what looked to have promise.

Blood Soaked clocks in at a rapid 64 minutes running time between opening and closing credits. I have to be honest I only watched until the 46 minute mark and I struggled to get that far. I think sadly even if all the technical aspects were executed well, this film still would have struggled to make any real impact. Plain and simply it’s just down to the lack of story compiled with the technical failures there just wasn’t much reason to continue watching. I haven’t seen “This Side Of Nightmare” but I imagine after seeing Blood Soaked that the idea may have worked a lot better as an experimental short film and maybe left as that. I really wish there was something good I could say about this, but I think I will leave it at that. I’m sure Peter will improve with more experience and I know he probably has some great ideas, hopefully one of which I will see in the not to distant future. I commend the team on having a go, I have never made anything and don’t know that I could, I am just a reviewer, just one person. Watch and find out for yourself. Thanks again for sending me the screener and I’m just sorry I couldn’t give this one a rave review. Those of you interested in checking it out and making your own judgements should support it and buy a cheap copy from the above link

My rating for “Blood Soaked” is 2/10

BIG BAD WOLVES

Well guys and girls this is a first for me. It’s a brand new film called “Big Bad Wolves” straight out of Israel and was made by directors Aharon Keshales and Navot Papushado. I’m a huge fan of European cinema and even though Israel is classified as part of the middle east and Africa, there are some great films coming out of places you’d least expect them to. This is the first film I have seen from Israel. It was one of only 7 films to be made in the country in the last year and all its dialogue is in Hebrew/Arabic.

Big Bad Wolves is a dark and disturbing adult fairytale of sorts.. but gone wrong. Micki (a cop with the Israeli police) is caught on camera beating a high school teacher named Dror, whom he believes is responsible for the sexual assault/violent murders of several young girls. The police chief suspends Micki but chooses to ignore any sideline investigation Micki wishes to carry out. Enter Gidi, the father of the most recent young girl to be murdered. Gidi has plans of his own for Dror and will not let anything or anyone get in the way of him carrying out his revenge, the question is do Gidi and Micki have the right man??

The first thing I noticed with the film was the comparisons between some of the faces we see in Hollywood and our three main characters here. Micki played by Lior Ashkenazi is a dead ringer for “No Country For Old Men’s” Javier Bardem. Dror (Rotem Keinan) reminded me very much of Michael Jeter (The Green Mile) who passed away a few years back. Lastly Gidi (Tzahi Grad) was a cross between “Fargo’s” Peter Stormare with a touch of Harrison Ford, very interesting and not something I expected to pick up on.

THE GOOD

Anyway, now that I have told you a little about the film and the actors in it let’s hash it out a bit more. Big Bad Wolves has such a wonderful screenplay it’s very well fleshed out and the characters may appear one-dimensional but each of them have select characteristics that make them interesting. The camera work, sound and editing are all flawless. The structure of each act is perfect. The story relies on building tension and a sense of dread throughout the interrogation scenes and once your drawn in you get some relief through some well-timed black comedy.

It’s got such a polished look about it for what I think it is a relatively low-budget film. It’s a travesty this hasn’t grossed a lot more money but at the same time I can see why. It’s a revenge story that is mostly made up of a boys club. If you combine that with the fact that its foreign and that is why most people are yet to hear about it. My favourite technical aspect of the film is the score, it’s absolutely brilliant. It reminded me a lot of Luc Besson’s film “The Professional” or “Leon” for those in Europe. The tension is built with a lot of bass and cello but when the atmosphere settles down it has a hint of some of Polanski’s films, I loved it.

The acting from everyone involved is wonderful too. It’s Tzahi Grad as “Gidi” who steals the show though. He is so calculated and controlled about the information he wants to know and how he is willing to go about getting it. I’m not a parent but I could relate to the feeling of despair you would have over losing a child, especially in such a violent way. I’m sure for the people who are parents there will be no hesitancy jumping on board with Gidi. Rotem and Lior are both very solid as Police officer and Suspect as well. The dialogue is so well written and rolls off the tounge very much like a live play. It’s quick-witted and clever. I loved the direction the film took because even though it is a Crime/Drama film that is marketed from a revenge point of view there remains several other layers in the story and a dynamic amongst the three men that really works. I have to mention the clever twist towards the end of the film, think subtly.

THE BAD

What can be said about Big Bad Wolves that’s bad, other than the Wolves themselves (haha). Only thing I will say is that I think it would be hard for women to enjoy this film because the three central characters are all male and given what the story is about, I’m just not sure. In fact there is only one women that appears for a few minutes in the first act, the rest of the story focuses on the three men. The other small point I’ll make was that I hoped to see a little more emotion from all three characters, specifically Dror and Gidi. For one, Gidi should be outraged with what he believes Dror has done to his daughter. He is in a way, but it was almost to controlled, he never has that breakdown moment and never takes a second to think maybe Dror isn’t the one responsible. Dror proclaims his innocence many times throughout the film yet he is willing to suffer torture at the hands of Gidi without really putting up much of a fight, I suppose that is to maintain the question, Did he do it? or is he innocent? So I kind of get that..

Wow, Big Bad Wolves what a fantastic and professionally made film. I found it to be a mix of Polanski’s film “Death Of A Maiden” and a French film I saw called “7 Days”. It’s a masterclass of acting and story structure, from a technical point of view its flawless. If not for a couple of minor things this would be a perfect film. Quentin Tarantino called this the best film of the year and let me tell you he was not far off the mark. There has been a lot of competition so far this year but Big Bad Wolves deserves to be seen by all! Prisoners has nothing on this film, including a better ending. Get yourself a copy now!!

My rating for “Big Bad Wolves” is 8.5/10

RED KINGDOM RISING

Here it is my new review it’s for a brand new film from director Navin Dev and it’s called “Red Kingdom Rising”. Navin has made a few short films but this is his first full length feature. I have followed the films imdb page for the better part of 12 months, after having seen a really cool teaser trailer and now it’s finally here! It’s a mix of “Pan’s Labyrinth” meets “Alice In Wonderland”. Red Kingdom Rising explores the human psyche and repressed memories that manifest themselves through obscure imagery and dark dreams revolving around a young women named Mary Ann.

Mary Ann (played by Emily Stride) is a young school teacher that’s having trouble getting by in day-to-day life. She is being plagued by terrifying and vivid dreams relating to a traumatic event from her past. She is dreaming about a mythical place called The Red Kingdom. With some advice from Esther (a therapist/friend of sorts), Mary Ann heads back to the house she grew up in to see her recluse mother and try to gain some answers in the hopes of moving on with her life.

THE GOOD

Firstly, the screenplay is a really interesting take on something that we have seen before in the aforementioned films. It’s both written and directed by Navin and he really knows what he is doing behind the camera and from a technical point of view. The audio and camera work in the film is leaps and bounds above anything else being produced on this kind of budget. I’m not sure what the budget on this one is but the production values are fantastic. Navin utilizes minimal locations and a small cast/crew, which of course is the best way to cut down on the budget. The dialogue is crisp and loud and the camera work is very personal with some smooth editing and transitioning between scenes.

Navin also manages to capture some truly eerie sound effects and a great piano based score which I quiet liked. This is more of a slow-burn style of filmmaking in the way that it doesn’t reply on cheap thrills or lots of effects. However, I will make mention of some of the cool practical blood and makeup effects because they were pretty good. It’s all very surreal visually so you never really know what’s a memory and what is a manifestation. The film’s strongest aspect though is the main 3 cast members, all females and are all very good. The standout however is Emily, I don’t know if she has had any past experience but the film’s success rests on her shoulders and she is wonderful in the role. With a short snappy running time of just 70 minutes RKR never feels like it’s running out of steam.

THE BAD

I can’t say to many bad things about the film given the amount of experience from those involved and the budget, it’s a successful project. I do think some of the lighting needed a bit of work, especially during the night scenes. It’s a little dark here and there with a few shadows inside the house. The scenes with her mother in the first half probably needed more prominent visualization. I think the film also misses the mark a little bit in the suspense department. I found the film to be less about scares and horror and more about the psyche and the way we deal with the bad experiences in our lives. There is nothing wrong with that storytelling but I think the idea for the film could have been marketed a little better to save confusion.

I found Etalia Turnball who played Alice to be a little over the top too. She is only a very young actress so I still think she was solid but some of the dialogue and annunciation needed a bit of work so her delivery wasn’t so inconsistent. Ultimately the only thing that disappointed me about the film though was that I found it to be very predictable. I don’t think everyone will share the same opinion as me but I quickly figured out the meaning of the Red King and he’s kingdom and pretty much the representation of the entire film. Obviously it’s made to be understood the deeper meaning, but I would have prefered it to have been a reveal late in the film and not so early.

Overall I really enjoyed Red Kingdom Rising. It was very reminiscent of a film I saw a while back called “The Silent House”. Mix that together with some Del Toro esq visuals and Tim Burton’s sound effects and you have RKR. Like I said, given the budget and experience this is a great little flick and from a technical view-point you are quiet a talent Navin. I would definitely recommend this to those people who like these types of films. However, the predictable nature might make it a little bland upon multiple viewings. Well done Navin and Co!

My rating for “Red Kingdom Rising” is 6/10

ALMOST HUMAN

I recently caught Joe Begos’s debut feature film “Almost Human” through the platform known as VOD (video on demand). It’s an independent horror/sci-fi film that was shot in Rhode Island and set in the 80’s. It was made for an estimated budget of $50,000. The film is about Mark Fisher (played by Josh Ethier), a young man who disappeared mysteriously two years ago after several flashes of blue light appeared at the front of his house. Neither his friend Seth (Graham Skipper) nor his girlfriend Jen (played by Vanessa Leigh), heard anything from Mark since. Two years have passed and Seth stars experiencing dreams and visions of Mark’s return…. the problem is Mark isn’t exactly himself anymore and no one is safe.

THE GOOD

For starters lets talk about the fantastic production value of Almost Human. When an estimated $50,000 was spent on the film you would think this screams “film school project” trust me it doesn’t. Based on the technical aspects and clever use of locations you would think this had ten times the budget. The camera work keeps you at a distance, acting as a catalyst for the mystery of the characters. I’m assuming most of it was shot with a steady-cam, it’s very smoothly shot and easy to watch. The audio is a little hollow in a few places and could use a bit of work but most of the dialogue was clear. I have to mention the great use of bass sound effects and the overall score is pretty good. It’s very reminiscent of  films like John Carpenters “The Thing” as well as Stephen King’s “Dreamcatcher”.

The actors/actresses were also a breath of fresh air. I haven’t seen Josh, Graham or Vanessa in any other films before. They aren’t perfect there is a moment or two throughout some of the more emotional scenes where it feels a little forced and flat but for the most part its all solid. I did a bit of research on Josh and found out he has some experience in editing. He worked on the tv-series “Holliston” as well as the recent horror/thriller film “Contracted” and now he has done the editing for Almost Human, as well as play the lead role. I admire anyone who can do a bit of everything.

The pacing of this film is its greatest strength and it’s what really makes it work. At just 70 minutes (excluding credits), it’s very fast and it has three very definitive acts. In between the storytelling and discovery of Mark’s whereabouts for the past two years we get some of the best practical effects I’ve seen in a film of this nature for a long time (given the budget). Some of the action sequences have some choppy choreography but deliver with plenty of the red stuff to make up for it. Use of axe’s, knives and guns make for some of the classic kills we all hope to see. If this was a PG-13 type of film I don’t think it would work anywhere near as well as it does. One particular kill at a gas station stands out above the rest (but I won’t spoil it for you).

THE BAD

I can’t say Almost Human contains all that much “bad”. Like I said the audio could use a bit of work in a few spots, along with some of the color in certain scenes looking a little washed out. That may be due to the time of the year the film was shot though or made to look that way on purpose. Joe’s got a cool screenplay her but its not all that original. I’m not one to really criticise a filmmaker for that though. We all have our favourite films and the inspiration for making your own probably comes from what you grow up with. This is simply a more modern, gore drive Horror/Sci-fi film compared to some of the greats like “Dreamcatcher”, “Invasion Of The Body Snatchers” or “The Thing”. I think where the film could have hit it’s straps was in the dream/vision portion of the story. What was shot didn’t add much to the context of the plot. I was looking for some greater meaning not just “they are looking to take over the world” kind of thing, that wasn’t all that well thought out.

I also had to think back to the opening credits where we are told the film takes place somewhere towards the end of the 80’s. I didn’t pay particular enough attention to vehicles, houses, technology or anything else for that matter. But I can only really say I felt the 80’s aspect more so because of the way Joe pays homage to some of those great films from that era, other than that I wouldn’t have known the period so I’m not sure why he opted to set it in that time.

Anyways, when the credits finally rolled I felt thoroughly entertained and after all that’s what you watch a film like this for. It’s got all the makings of a good low-budget indie Horror/Sc-fi flick. With a little smoothing round the edges and some development in the plot this could have been one of the greats. I think for a debut feature film this is about the best you’re going to see, given the very low-budget. Almost Human is currently on VOD and Amazon platforms but those in other countries will have to wait for the official Dvd release. Stay tuned and be sure to check this one out!

My rating for “Almost Human” is 7/10

PMS COP

Firstly I would just like to say thankyou to Bryon Blakey (director of PMS Cop) for allowing me to view a screener of the film before its official release date. PMS Cop is a story about Mary, a police officer (played with great enthusiasm by Heather Hall) who is caught on live tv beating a clown rapist. After a series of unfortunate events and a friend’s death she is forced by the department to take part in a big corporations experimental drug trial for a PMS inhibitor known as Corybantic. The side effects haven’t really been discovered yet and what follows is carnage and mayhem where no one is safe.

The film stars Heather Hall, Cindy Means, Elaine Jenkins, Megan Dehart and David J. Lee. It was shot in Springfield Missouri for an estimated budget of $30,000.

THE GOOD

PMS Cop has a very unique premise. Although it’s a completely ludicrous plot, it’s an entertaining one. It pays homage to certain films like “Kill Bill” with a fondling scene in a research ward and also the 80’s slasher film “Maniac Cop” (one of my favourites). I liked that this had a real 80’s vibe about it. It’s got some very smooth close shot camera work. The research facility hallways made for crisp panning and movement that works well considering the limited funds. The audio was a bit hollow in the beginning of the film but improved very quickly in the second and third acts. I like the use of muted inaudible dialogue when Mary is on the verge of snapping. Let’s talk about the character of Mary for a minute. She is a bit of a potty mouth but she still seems really likeable. She is very quick-witted and doesn’t take anyone’s shit. I think Heather played the role really well and is clearly the standout in and otherwise lack-lustre cast.

It’s nice to see a bit of back story on Mary and why she has these episodes and anger issues. It wasn’t delved into nearly enough, but I suppose that wasn’t the main attraction of the film. I also enjoyed some of the suspense score throughout the chase scenes. The action itself lacked any real suspense but at least the score was commendable. The strongest aspect of PMS Cop is the cool realistic practical effects and blood. A couple of truly brutal kill scenes will definitely go down as some of the best I have ever seen, given this very small budget. One in particular stands out for its far-fetched but super slapstick nature.

THE BAD

Sadly the bad outweighs the good when it comes to PMS Cop, even taking that small budget into consideration. Like I said the audio needed some work in the opening 15-20 minutes of the film, along with some of the music choices leaving little to be desired. The entire film is terribly lit. I was hoping it would get better as it progressed but if anything it got worse. The actors faces can hardly be seen during the whole second half of the film and there is no excuse for that. The only scenes that sort of worked were the daytime shots which were few and far between, It was the most disappointing part of the film. The acting by all involved with the exception of Heather was well below par, some of it even cringe-worthy. The character of Doctor Sokolov and that terribly inconsistent Russian accent made it impossible to take her seriously. The character should have been written as an American because the European touch was just distracting.

The choreography for the action/fight scenes was poor as were the sound effects. It either wasn’t in synch properly or their was no sound to accompany the action. There were a few small issues like the cop car not looking like a cop car but I can handle that because it wasn’t that important. Sadly the core of the film is lost in the entire second and third acts. Way to much time was spent on experimenting and investigations into the effects etc, which all took place in incredibly dark rooms. It needed to be more slasher orientated because the quality of the blood and gore effects was great so a lot more of that was needed. As soon as Heather left the film and Cindy entered as PMS Cop it just didn’t have the same feel. I didn’t realise the two parts were going to be played by separate actresses. I’m not sure if the decision to do that was the right one, considering Cindy doesn’t say anything for her entire screen time.

Unfortunately PMS Cop had to many pacing issues for me to want to revisit it a second time. It’s a real shame because it’s a cool and unique idea with a great leading lady and some cool practical effects but the screenplay is just not up to scratch. I commend Bryon on his effort here though. I believe this is only his third time directing so I have no doubt that he will improve and soon enough he is going to combine all the elements for a winning result. I still think given the budget this is worth a look if you are struggling for something to find on a Saturday night.

My rating for “PMS Cop” is 4/10